Round 1: free tiers · tested Oct 18, 2026
We uploaded the same 37:50 interview to OpusClip, Vizard and Klap through each tool's free entry point and measured the top 3 clips each tool returned. OpusClip's free entry point turned out to be a 7-day trial of its paid Essential plan, not a free plan. Klap's free trial made clips but would not let us download them. CapCut, Descript and Submagic were not tested in this round.
| Date | Oct 18, 2026 (CT), browser tests by the same tester |
|---|---|
| Input | The identical 37:50 1080p MP4 for every tool (748 MB) |
| Settings | English, 9:16, clip length on the tool's auto setting, default caption style, no edits |
| Clips measured | Each tool's top 3 clips by its own ranking (the full protocol uses 5) |
| Plans | OpusClip: 7-day Essential trial (no card). Vizard: Free plan. Klap: free trial. |
Scores at a glance
Scores use the published 100-point rubric. 'Not scored' means we did not measure it; it does not mean zero. Totals are shown out of the points we could measure, so each one is partial.
| Criterion (max) | OpusClip Paid-plan trial | Vizard Free plan | Klap Free trial, no export |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clip quality (30) | Not scored | Not scored | Not measurable |
| Caption accuracy (20) | 19.9 | 19.9 | Not measurable |
| Speaker framing (15) | 13.8 | 13.5 | Not measurable |
| Time (10) | 8 (provisional) | 10 (provisional) | Not scorable |
| Cost (15) | Not scored | Not scored | Not scored |
| Watermark & export (10) | 4 / 8 measured | 0 / 8 measured | 0 / 8 measured |
| Total | 45.7 / 53 measurable | 43.4 / 53 measurable | 0 / 8 measurable |
OpusClip
Partial: trial of a paid plan, not a free tierPlan used: 7-day Essential plan trial (started automatically, no card). Partial. Clip quality and cost are not scored, and export expiry was not checked.
| Criterion | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Clip quality max 30 | Not scored | Needs two blind human raters, which we haven't run yet. Boundary check against the reference transcript: all 3 clips start and end on a complete thought (clip 1 drops a leading 'Well,'). Clip 3 is entirely contained in clip 2. Clip 2 opens with a 6 s hook quote taken from later in the same answer. OpusClip also removed one restart inside clip 1. Lengths are 1:08, 1:57 and 0:43; we asked for 30–60 s. |
| Caption accuracy max 20 | 19.9 | 3 errors in 658 reference words (WER 0.5%): 'guaranteed' for 'guarantee', 'where' for 'we're', and one dropped 'that'. No clip has a median caption delay over 0.5 s (median +0.3 s), so no timing deduction. |
| Speaker framing max 15 | 13.8 | The active speaker's whole face is in frame in 92.1% of 229 frames (sampled 1 per second). Misses are cutaways to the listener, mostly reaction shots that are already in the source edit. |
| Time max 10 | 8 (provisional) | 21–26 min from upload start to clips ready (upload ~4 min, processing 17–21 min); we scored the slow end. Round B fix time is not included yet. |
| Cost max 15 | Not scored | Rubric cost is per postable clip on the cheapest plan that exports watermark-free 1080p. We did not test a paid plan. Free-tier result: $0, using 37 of the trial's 90 credits. |
| Watermark & export max 10 | 4 / 8 measured | Watermark: 0 of 4 ('OpusClip' logo on the downloads). Resolution: 4 of 4 (1080×1920 MP4). Export expiry: not checked (2 points unscored). |
Run details: times, credits, limits
| Upload | ~4 min |
|---|---|
| Processing | ~17–21 min after submit |
| Total | ~21–26 min |
| Credits used | 37 of 90 (trial) |
| Clips returned | 33, 0:26–2:16, virality scores 74–99 |
| Top clip | 'Designer Babies: Should We Choose Our Child's Traits?' (score 99, 1:08) |
| Captions | Animated word-by-word captions with colored keywords; hook headline on the top 10 clips |
| Framing | Active-speaker face tracking |
| Export | 1080×1920 H.264 MP4, 'OpusClip' watermark |



12-second previews (360p, with audio)
Vizard
Partial: free planPlan used: Free plan (60 credits/month, 1 GB / 1 h upload cap). Partial. Clip quality and cost are not scored, and export expiry was not checked.
| Criterion | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Clip quality max 30 | Not scored | Needs two blind human raters, which we haven't run yet. Boundary check: clips 1 and 3 start and end on complete thoughts. Clip 2 ends mid-sentence ('…as humans are multigenic' and the speaker continues 'meaning there are…'). Lengths are 0:47, 0:35 and 0:50, all within the 30–60 s target. |
| Caption accuracy max 20 | 19.9 | 2 errors in 324 reference words (WER 0.6%): 'is' for 'it's', and the last word ('faster') is missing because the outro card covers it. Timing is tighter than OpusClip's: median caption onset +0.1 s. |
| Speaker framing max 15 | 13.5 | The active speaker's whole face is in frame in 89.7% of 126 frames (1 per second; the end card is excluded). In clip 2 the camera stays on the listener for 8 s while Dan Rather asks his question. Split-screen frames showing both faces count as in frame. |
| Time max 10 | 10 (provisional) | 17 min or less from upload start to clips ready (upload ~6 min, processing 10 min or less). Round B fix time is not included yet. |
| Cost max 15 | Not scored | We did not test a paid plan. Free-tier result: $0, using 37 of 60 monthly credits. |
| Watermark & export max 10 | 0 / 8 measured | Watermark: 0 of 4 ('Made with vizard.ai' on the video plus a branded end card). Resolution: 0 of 4 (720×1280 maximum on Free). Export expiry: not checked (2 points unscored). |
Run details: times, credits, limits
| Upload | ~6 min |
|---|---|
| Processing | 10 min or less |
| Total | 17 min or less |
| Credits used | 37 of 60 (monthly free allowance) |
| Clips returned | 10, 0:33–1:06, scores 9.2–10.0 |
| Captions | Word-by-word captions with colored keywords and emojis; title caption |
| Framing | Face-centered crop plus a two-speaker split screen; continuous tracking not confirmed |
| Export | 720×1280 H.264 MP4, 'Made with vizard.ai' watermark, ~2 s branded end card |




12-second previews (360p, with audio)
Klap
Partial: free trial cannot exportPlan used: Free trial (accepted the 748 MB file). Partial. The free trial will not download clips, so nothing that depends on an exported clip could be measured. That is not a low quality score.
| Criterion | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Clip quality max 30 | Not measurable | No exported clips. |
| Caption accuracy max 20 | Not measurable | Captions were only seen in low-resolution in-app previews, which we did not measure. |
| Speaker framing max 15 | Not measurable | Previews showed face reframing, including a two-speaker layout with an inset, but we have no exports to sample. |
| Time max 10 | Not scorable | Clips were previewable after ~12.5–16.5 min (upload ~3.5 min, processing 9–13 min), but the free trial never produced a postable clip. |
| Cost max 15 | Not scored | Downloading requires a paid plan. The upgrade screen showed Basic $14/mo, Pro $29/mo and Pro+ $94/mo, billed yearly. We did not buy one. |
| Watermark & export max 10 | 0 / 8 measured | No export at all on the free trial, so 0 for watermark-free free export and 0 for resolution. Expiry does not apply. |
Run details: times, credits, limits
| Upload | ~3.5 min |
|---|---|
| Processing | ~9–13 min |
| Clips returned | 13, 0:16–1:14, scores 69–85 |
| Previews (not measured) | Uppercase word-by-word captions with the current word in yellow, a hook title and face reframing; no watermark visible on low-res previews |
| Export | Paywalled ('Upgrade to download') |
No frames: this tool's free trial does not allow downloads, so we have no output files to show.
Frames and previews are excerpts of each tool's output from "Conversations in Science with Dan Rather & Jennifer Doudna – CRISPR" by Wonder Collaborative, licensed CC BY 3.0, clipped, reframed and captioned by the named tool and cropped and compressed by BenchedTools. Dan Rather, Jennifer Doudna and Wonder Collaborative are not affiliated with BenchedTools and do not endorse any tool or this ranking. Tool watermarks appear as exported.
What we measured, and how
- Caption accuracy. We OCR'd burned-in captions at 5–10 frames per second with Tesseract 5.5. We compared them with our corrected reference transcript after removing fillers and restarts. Every disagreement was then checked by eye on the frames, and OCR misreads were discarded. Both tools' raw OCR error rates before review were 10–35%, almost all of it OCR noise.
- Caption timing: when each caption appeared on screen compared with when the word starts in a Whisper transcription of the clip's own audio.
- Clip boundaries: we transcribed each clip's audio with Whisper and located it in our reference transcript, which shows whether a clip starts or ends mid-sentence and whether the tool cut words out.
- Speaker framing: 1 frame per second, scored by one reviewer (an agent, not blind) against who is speaking in the reference transcript.
- Resolution, codec and watermark, read from the downloaded files with ffprobe and checked on the frames.
What we did not measure
- Clip quality (30 points). The rubric needs two blind human raters; we have not run that.
- Cost (15 points). We tested no paid plans, so cost per postable clip on the cheapest watermark-free 1080p plan is unknown.
- Export expiry (2 points). We did not check how long downloads stay available.
- Round B (up to 10 minutes of manual fixes) and its effect on time. Only Round A defaults were measured, and only 3 clips per tool instead of 5.
- Klap: nothing that depends on an exported clip. CapCut was skipped because the email is already tied to an existing account. Descript sign-up was blocked by bot protection. Submagic needs a paid add-on.
Coming next
- Blind clip-quality ratings by two human raters for each tool's top 5 clips.
- Paid-plan runs (only with the owner's approval) to score cost and watermark-free 1080p export for OpusClip, Vizard and Klap.
- Round B timing, export expiry checks, and clips 4–5 for each tool.
- CapCut, Descript and Submagic, once account access is sorted out.
Data
The test task
Every tool gets the same 37:50 two-person interview (1080p MP4, identical file). Ask for vertical 9:16 clips of 30–60 seconds with burned-in captions, English, default caption style. Round A: accept the tool's own top 5 clips with default settings, no edits. Round B: up to 10 minutes of manual fixes per tool (trim, re-pick, caption corrections) to reach 5 postable clips. Same tester, same week, same browser, cheapest plan that allows the run.
The test input
| Video | Conversations in Science with Dan Rather & Jennifer Doudna – CRISPR |
|---|---|
| By | Wonder Collaborative |
| License | CC BY 3.0 |
| Length | 37 min 50 s |
| Format | 1080p, two-person, multi-camera interview in English |
What we measure
- Clip quality (30 pts): two raters blind-score each of the 5 Round A clips 1–5 on: starts and ends on a complete thought, contains a genuine highlight, works without context
- Caption accuracy (20 pts): word error rate against our corrected reference transcript, plus timing (captions within 0.5 s of speech)
- Speaker framing (15 pts): share of clip time the active speaker is fully in frame, sampled once per second; penalties for cut-off faces and framing the listener
- Time (10 pts): wall-clock minutes from upload start to 5 postable clips, including processing and Round B fixes
- Cost (15 pts): cost per postable clip on the cheapest plan that exports watermark-free 1080p; free-tier result reported separately
- Watermark and export (10 pts): watermark on free tier, max export resolution, export expiry, file format
Scoring rubric (100 points)
| Criterion | Points | How it's scored |
|---|---|---|
| Clip quality | 30 | Mean blind rating (1–5) of the 5 default clips × 6 |
| Caption accuracy | 20 | 20 × (1 − WER), minus 2 per clip with caption timing drift > 0.5 s (floor 0) |
| Speaker framing | 15 | 15 × share of sampled frames with the active speaker's face fully in frame |
| Time | 10 | 10 if ≤ 15 min; minus 1 per extra 5 min (floor 0) |
| Cost | 15 | 15 at $0 per postable clip; minus 1 per $0.50 per clip (floor 0) |
| Watermark & export | 10 | Watermark-free on free tier: 4; 1080p+ export: 4; no export expiry under 7 days: 2 |
Candidates (6) · alphabetical, not ranked
Methodology
Every candidate gets the identical task and inputs, on the cheapest plan that can complete it, tested in the same week. We publish each tool's output, settings, what the run cost and the test date. Rankings only change when we re-test. Read the full methodology →
FAQ
Have you tested these tools yet?
Partly. Round 1 (Oct 18, 2026) measured OpusClip, Vizard and Klap on their free entry points. Some criteria are not scored yet, so there is no overall winner. CapCut, Descript and Submagic are still queued.
Which video do you use?
A 37-minute CC BY 3.0 interview, 'Conversations in Science with Dan Rather & Jennifer Doudna – CRISPR' by Wonder Collaborative, from Wikimedia Commons. Every tool gets the identical file, and anyone can download it to reproduce our test.
Can a tool pay to rank higher?
No. Paid fast-track submissions only speed up review. Placement in rankings comes only from test results.
Will you publish the clips?
We publish frames, 12-second previews and all our measurement data on this page, credited to the original video under CC BY 3.0. The full-length downloads (60–175 MB each) are kept by us and not hosted on the site.